Skip to content

Breaking News

Pat May, business reporter, San Jose Mercury News, for his Wordpress profile. (Michael Malone/Bay Area News Group)
PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:

Seven months ago, when Howard Schultz announced his resignation as CEO of Starbucks and hinted about his political aspirations by saying things like “public service is one of the things I might consider,” a Reddit user named “u/flippingi_birds” asked what people thought about putting a barista-in-chief hopeful for the White House.

Someone wrote: “He’s a random billionaire who thinks that his Starbucks PR team qualifies him to run for president. He has no real governmental qualifications, He has no political base to stand on, an utter lack of name recognition, and the dude is literally a special interest. How many more times do Americans need to be punished for voting for random rich guys before they realize that elites don’t care about them. Schultz is a bad choice, full stop.”

And it went downhill from there.

When Schultz took to “60 Minutes” on Sunday to tell correspondent Scott Pelley that he was “seriously thinking of running for president” and that he would “run as a centrist independent, outside of the two-party system,” the floodgates of public option once again opened wide.

While his supporters are thrilled with the idea of a Schultz run for the highest office in the land, apparently there are many other people, including many Democrats, who consider his candidacy a very bad idea and Schultz personally as a party-spoiler of the highest magnitude. Meanwhile, the tweeter-in-chief offered his own assessment: “Howard Schultz doesn’t have the ‘guts’ to run for President!” President Donald Trump said Monday on Twitter.

Here’s a taste:

https://twitter.com/AnandWrites/status/1089916748541906944

https://twitter.com/jonlovett/status/1089990423534157824

https://twitter.com/sw2003_/status/1089927602033303554